• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Linear Motion Tips

Covering Linear Motion Systems, Components and Linear Motion Resources

  • News
    • Editor’s blog
    • Industry news
    • Motion Casebook
  • Applications
  • Slides + guides
    • Ball + roller guides
    • Track roller (cam + wheel) guides
    • Crossed-roller slides
    • Linear bearings
    • Plastic + composite guides
  • Drives
    • Ball + lead + roller screws
    • Belt + chain drives for linear
    • Rack + pinion sets
  • Actuators
    • Ball + leadscrew driven
    • Belt + chain driven
    • Linear motors
    • Mini + piezo + voice coil
    • Rack + pinion driven
    • Rigid-chain actuators
  • Encoders + sensors (linear) + I/O
  • Stages + gantries
  • Resources
    • Suppliers
    • Video

What’s the difference between serial kinematics and parallel kinematics in multi-axis motion design?

★ By Lisa Eitel 1 Comment

Today’s positioning tables and stages include hardware and software that’s more customized than ever to satisfy specific output requirements. That’s made for motion designs that move accurately through even complicated multi-axis commands.

Precision feedback is key to such functionality — often taking the form of optical or (electronics-augmented) magnetic encoders for nanometer-scale resolution and repeatability … even over long travel.

In fact, miniature stage design is spurring the most innovation from feedback and control algorithms to move even very large loads with sub-sub-micron precision.

Physik Instrumente (PI) now sells an H-811.F2 high-dynamics hexapod. Designed for photonics alignment applications, the hexapod provides six degrees of freedom, actuator resolution of 5 nm, and repeatability to 60 nm … at speeds to 20 mm/sec. Bearing loads to 5 kg, the hexapod features a removable magnetic kinematic plate to accelerate workflow with fiber-optics components. Travel is to 34 mm and 42° of rotary motion.

First some background: Use of pre-engineered stages and Cartesian robots continues to rise with rapid prototyping, automated research applications, and tighter time-to-market pressures. That’s especially true for photonics, medical-device, and semiconductor R&D and manufacturing. In the past, building multi-axis motion for automating or otherwise improving tasks meant design engineers had to source and combine linear stages into X-Y-Z combinations … in-house.

Any more degrees of freedom necessitated the after addition of goniometers, rotary stages, and other end effectors.

Called serial kinematics, such machine builds sometimes result in bulky setups with accumulated error due to tolerance stackup. In some cases, bearings also limit such assemblies to one rotational center.

These are non-issues when the design satisfies its motion requirements … but miniature motion designs in particular aren’t so forgiving of such factors.

This Cartesian setup includes components (actuators and linear slides) from PHD, Inc. Particularly common in packaging applications, such stages are increasingly modular.

Contrast these builds with hexapod or Stewart platforms — forms of parallel kinematic actuators for motion. At least for miniature multi-axis motion assemblies, these outperform serial kinematics. That’s in part because hexapod output motion isn’t limited by bearing (linear and rotary) ratings.

Instead, the motion controls execute algorithms to an application-defined pivot point (center of rotation) unencumbered by error accumulation. Lower component count, lower inertia, and higher stiffness are other benefits.

As detailed in related articles on linearmotiontips.com, traditional motion systems can often work in conjunction with positioning stages having parallel kinematics — and traditional electromagnetic motors with piezoelectric motors … even on common assemblies or installations.

You Might Also Like

Filed Under: Featured, Integrated Linear Systems, Mini + piezo + voice coil, Stages + gantries

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anne Duget says

    ★ at

    The hexapod has another nice advantage compared to stacked serial stages: there are no moving cables, as they all come out from the fixed platform. The whole assembly is neater in the end.
    And there are no efforts created by these cables, so the positioning performances of the hexapod can be better as the payload does not see the efforts created by the cables!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center
“lmt
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.
“linear

RSS Motion Control Tips

  • PICMA Plus piezo actuators offer extended displacement range
  • New motors, gearhead, and encoders with 16-mm diameter from FAULHABER
  • SSEAC subsea actuator provides precise flow control on the seabed
  • Using motion controls in autonomous robotics
  • PI releases V-781 XY stage series for precision motion systems

RSS Featured White Papers

  • Robotic Automation is Indispensable for the Logistics Industry’s Continued Growth and Success
  • Reliable Linear Motion For Packaging Machines
  • Technical Brief – “Understanding the Extensive Benefits of Total Linear Positioning Systems.”

Footer

Linear Motion Tips

Design World Network

Design World Online
The Robot Report
Coupling Tips
Motion Control Tips
Bearing Tips
Fastener Engineering
Wire and Cable Tips

Linear Motion Tips

Subscribe to our newsletter
Advertise with us
Contact us
About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy